How Coal Phase-Out Helped Reduce Air Pollution

The phasing out of coal-fired power plants has been a topic of discussion and action for governments and energy providers worldwide. Coal has long been a reliable energy source, but it is incredibly dirty, and the process of burning it releases harmful pollutants that negatively impact the environment and public health. These pollutants include mercury, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, particulate matter, and carbon dioxide.

In 2005, the Canadian province of Ontario began phasing out its coal-fired power plants, and by 2014, the number of smog days in the province had dropped from 53 to zero. This drastic improvement in air quality led to significant health benefits for Ontarians, including reduced respiratory irritation, improved lung function, and less aggravated asthma.

Similarly, the closure of three coal power plants near Pittsburgh resulted in a 9% reduction in PM2.5 levels in the area. Additionally, the elimination of coal in Ontario was associated with a reduction in average urban PM2.5 levels by about 6-12%. However, the impact on nitrogen oxide levels was less clear, as the reduction was attributed to a decrease in US NOx emissions.

While phasing out coal has improved air quality and reduced greenhouse gas emissions, it is not a silver bullet solution. The transition to cleaner energy sources, such as renewables, comes with its own set of challenges and upfront capital costs. Additionally, the electricity price hike experienced by Ontarians cannot be solely attributed to the coal phase-out but is also a result of deferred costs of electricity grid infrastructure investments and nuclear plant refurbishments.

Overall, the phasing out of coal has yielded small improvements in air quality, and the health and climate benefits of these actions will be felt for decades to come.

Did the coal phase-out improve health outcomes?

The coal phase-out in Ontario, Canada, in 2005, and the subsequent closure of the Lambton and Nanticoke coal-fired power facilities in southern Ontario, was expected to result in a reduction in smog-related air contaminants, yielding around $3 billion in annual savings for the healthcare system.

The phase-out was projected to have a modest effect on air quality, which was consistent with emissions inventory data showing that electricity generation was a minor contributor to particulate and ozone pollution at the time. However, the elimination of coal was associated with a reduction in average urban PM2.5 levels by about 1 to 2 mg/m3 (about 6–12 percent from peak levels). There was no significant impact on NOx levels, which were influenced by the reduction in US NOx emissions. A statistically significant reduction in peak O3 levels was observed, but this was offset by a significant increase related to natural gas plant emissions.

Overall, the coal phase-out resulted in minor improvements in air quality in certain locations, which were comparable to the projected improvements that could have been achieved through the installation of new pollution control systems.

In terms of health outcomes, the specific benefits of the phase-out will take time to fully understand and quantify. However, it is well-known that smog can irritate the respiratory system, reduce and damage lung function, and aggravate asthma. The health benefits of improved air quality are expected to be felt for decades, and families across Ontario have already experienced these benefits.

What are the environmental benefits of the coal phase-out?

The environmental benefits of the coal phase-out are significant and wide-ranging. Firstly, coal-fired power plants are major contributors to air pollution, producing harmful emissions such as mercury, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, particulate matter, carbon dioxide, and other toxic heavy metals. These pollutants have been linked to a range of respiratory and cardiovascular issues, including asthma, bronchitis, lung disease, heart attacks, and even premature death. By eliminating coal, we can expect to see a reduction in these harmful emissions, leading to improved air quality and public health outcomes.

The effects of the coal phase-out on air quality have been studied in several regions, including Ontario, Canada, where the number of smog days decreased significantly, dropping from 53 in 2005 to 0 in 2014. This improvement in air quality is expected to have a positive impact on the health of Ontarians, reducing respiratory issues and potentially extending life expectancy. Additionally, the coal phase-out in Ontario resulted in a 7% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions across the province, with a nearly 20% reduction in the energy sector specifically. This makes the coal phase-out "the single largest greenhouse gas reduction measure in North America."

The environmental benefits of the coal phase-out extend beyond just air quality improvements. Coal mining can also have detrimental effects on the environment, including mountaintop removal and valley fill mining, which can alter landscapes and pollute downstream aquatic ecosystems. By transitioning away from coal, we can reduce the need for these destructive mining practices and minimize their ecological impacts.

Furthermore, the coal phase-out can have a positive impact on water resources. Coal-fired power plants are often located near water bodies, and their operations can lead to water pollution and ecological damage. By phasing out coal, we can reduce the risk of coal ash impoundment ruptures and protect aquatic life from toxic pollutants.

While the coal phase-out may not be a "silver bullet" solution, it is a crucial step towards improving air quality, mitigating climate change, and safeguarding public health. The transition away from coal needs to be accompanied by efforts to promote clean energy and combat pollution across all sectors of the economy. However, the environmental and health benefits of the coal phase-out are undeniable, and it is a necessary step towards a more sustainable and resilient future.

How does coal contribute to air pollution?

Coal is a carbon-rich black rock that is mined from the ground and burned to release energy. However, burning coal also releases airborne toxins and pollutants, making coal a major contributor to air pollution.

When coal is burned, it releases toxic heavy metals such as mercury, lead, and arsenic, which can have detrimental effects on human health and the environment. For example, mercury can damage the nervous, digestive, and immune systems, and even small amounts can render fish unsafe to eat. Coal-fired power plants in the US emitted 45,676 pounds of mercury in 2014. Similarly, arsenic causes cancer in one out of 100 people who consume water with 50 parts per billion of arsenic. In addition to heavy metals, burning coal releases sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and particulate matter, which are linked to respiratory issues, cardiovascular problems, and premature death.

The air pollution from coal-fired power plants has been associated with asthma, cancer, heart and lung ailments, neurological problems, and other severe health impacts. It also contributes to acid rain, which damages crops, ecosystems, lakes, and streams. Furthermore, coal contributes to global warming, as the carbon dioxide released during coal combustion acts as a heat-trapping gas, leading to rising temperatures, sea level rise, and ecological disruptions.

While limits set by organizations like the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) have helped to reduce emissions, many plants still lack the necessary pollution controls. Phasing out coal-fired power plants can lead to small improvements in air quality, as seen in Ontario, Canada, where the elimination of coal resulted in a reduction in fine particulate levels. However, the overall impact on air quality may be modest, and other measures such as installing new pollution control systems should also be considered.

What are the specific health benefits of the coal phase-out?

The specific health benefits of the coal phase-out are varied and significant. Firstly, the reduction in air pollutants has direct health benefits for individuals, particularly those with pre-existing respiratory issues. The phase-out has been linked to a decrease in smog days, with Ontario, Canada, experiencing a reduction from 53 days in 2005 to zero in 2014. This improvement in air quality is due to the removal of harmful pollutants, such as fine particulates (PM2.5), nitrogen oxides (NOx), and ground-level ozone (O3), which are emitted by coal-fired power plants. These pollutants are known to irritate the respiratory system, reduce and damage lung function, and aggravate asthma. By phasing out coal, the risk of these health issues is significantly reduced, leading to improved respiratory health for individuals, especially those with asthma or other chronic respiratory diseases.

Moreover, the coal phase-out has broader health implications beyond respiratory health. Coal-fired power plants emit toxic heavy metals such as mercury, which can damage the nervous, digestive, and immune systems and pose a serious threat to child development. By eliminating coal, the risk of exposure to these toxic pollutants is mitigated, benefiting the overall health of the population, especially children. Additionally, coal combustion releases sulfur dioxide (SO2), which contributes to the formation of smog and acid rain. Acid rain can have far-reaching consequences, damaging crops and ecosystems and acidifying lakes and streams. By reducing SO2 emissions through the coal phase-out, the health of both human and animal life is improved, as the harmful effects of acid rain on the environment are diminished.

Furthermore, the coal phase-out has contributed to the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, specifically carbon dioxide (CO2). As CO2 is the primary driver of global warming, the decrease in emissions has positive health implications for the entire planet. Global warming leads to rising temperatures, accelerating sea levels, and an increased risk of droughts, heat waves, and intense rainfall. By reducing CO2 emissions through the coal phase-out, we are mitigating the health risks associated with global warming, including heat-related illnesses, water scarcity, and the spread of vector-borne diseases.

While the specific health benefits of the coal phase-out are still being studied and quantified, it is clear that this transition has had a positive impact on the health of individuals and communities. The reduction in air pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions has improved respiratory health, lowered the risk of exposure to toxic heavy metals, and mitigated the health risks associated with global warming. These health benefits will be felt for decades to come, as the phase-out continues to improve air quality and combat climate change.

What are the economic implications of the coal phase-out?

Phasing out coal has significant economic implications, both positive and negative. On the one hand, the transition away from coal can lead to substantial cost savings, particularly in the healthcare sector, due to the reduction of air pollutants and associated health issues. On the other hand, there are also economic challenges associated with the coal phase-out, especially in regions heavily dependent on the coal industry.

One of the most significant economic implications of the coal phase-out is the potential for cost savings. For example, in Ontario, Canada, a cost-benefit analysis estimated that phasing out coal-fired power plants could result in approximately $3 billion in annual savings for the healthcare system by reducing smog-related air contaminants. Similarly, economists have suggested that the overall benefits of the coal phase-out to society could exceed 1% of GDP each year until the end of the 21st century. These savings take into account the reduction of healthcare costs associated with respiratory diseases and other health issues caused by coal-fired power plants.

However, there are also economic challenges associated with the transition away from coal. The closure or repurposing of coal mines and power plants can have significant economic consequences, particularly in regions that are heavily dependent on the coal industry. Coal-dependent regions often have economies and local identities closely tied to the coal value chain. Managing the transition away from coal requires careful planning to minimise the impact on affected workers and communities. It may involve providing compensation, early retirement packages, retraining programs, and other forms of economic diversification to ensure a just transition for those impacted by the coal phase-out.

Additionally, the transition away from coal may result in increased energy costs in the short term, especially in developing countries. While renewable energy sources are often more cost-effective in the long run, the initial investment in infrastructure and technology can be significant. This may pose a challenge for countries that rely heavily on coal as a cheap source of energy. However, initiatives such as the Just Energy Transition Partnership aim to address this issue by providing financing and support for developing countries transitioning away from coal.

Furthermore, the phase-out of coal can impact employment, particularly in regions where coal mining and power plants are major sources of jobs. While the energy transition may create new job opportunities in the clean energy sector, there may not be a direct one-to-one replacement for jobs lost in the coal industry. It is important for governments to consider the potential impact on employment and develop strategies to support workers during the transition.

Overall, the economic implications of the coal phase-out are complex and far-reaching. While the transition away from coal can lead to significant cost savings and health benefits, it also presents challenges in terms of energy costs, employment, and economic impacts on coal-dependent regions. Careful planning, international cooperation, and targeted investments will be crucial to ensure a smooth and just transition towards a coal-free future.

Frequently asked questions