Space Pollution: Is It Possible To Contaminate The Cosmos?

Space exploration has been a source of fascination and wonder for decades, but it's crucial to consider its environmental impact. The accumulation of space junk, including rocket debris and inactive satellites, poses a significant threat to future space exploration and the Earth's environment. The disintegration of these objects in the atmosphere can release harmful pollutants, such as nitrogen and aluminium oxides, which have the potential to damage the ozone layer and alter the Earth's albedo, affecting the temperature of the upper atmosphere. With an increasing number of rocket launches and the introduction of mega-constellations, the issue of space pollution is becoming more pressing.

Rocket launches produce harmful pollutants

The increase in the number of satellites being launched, such as SpaceX's Starlink constellation, is contributing to the growing problem of space junk and the pollution caused when these satellites burn up in the Earth's atmosphere. SpaceX's Falcon 9 rocket, for example, burns a type of fuel similar to aviation propellant kerosene and emits soot, which could contribute to climate change and ozone depletion.

The pollution caused by rocket launches is not limited to the upper atmosphere. The toxic rocket fuel UDMH, or unsymmetrical dimethylhydrazine, has been blamed for turning the Kazakh Steppe into an ecological disaster zone, with reports of it raining down on the grasslands and poisoning the soil for decades. UDMH is highly carcinogenic, and locals have reported a disproportionate number of cancer cases in the area, which many believe is due to the UDMH in the fuel tank debris.

The exact implications of rocket propellant emissions on the climate are still unclear and require further study. However, it is evident that this issue will continue to grow and affect the Earth in the future, especially with the expected increase in rocket launches and the growth of satellite fleets.

Space junk poses a threat to future space exploration

Space junk is a growing concern as more and more satellites and other objects accumulate in Earth's orbit. This accumulation poses a significant threat to future space exploration due to the increased risk of collisions with functioning satellites and spacecraft. The risk of collision is substantial, given the sheer number of objects currently in orbit and their potential to slam into other objects at speeds of up to 5 miles per second. A single collision can generate thousands of pieces of debris, which can remain in orbit for decades, increasing the likelihood of further collisions. The International Space Station (ISS) has already had to perform 25 debris collision avoidance manoeuvres since 1999.

The problem of space junk is not just confined to the risk posed to space exploration. Some space junk gradually loses altitude and burns up in Earth's atmosphere, but larger debris can impact the Earth and have detrimental effects on the environment. For example, debris from Russian Proton rockets has been linked to a disproportionate number of cancer cases in the Altai region of eastern Siberia, due to the presence of highly toxic fuel residue.

Efforts to tackle the problem of space junk have been made since the 1990s, with NASA's orbital debris mitigation policy and guidelines, and the implementation of the U.S. Government Orbital Debris Mitigation Standard Practices. However, it is estimated that only half of all space emissions abide by these guidelines. The introduction of mega-constellations, or mass groupings of artificial satellites, will further exacerbate the problem.

To address the issue, economists have proposed attaching an annual fee to each satellite put into orbit, with the fee increasing over time, to discourage the unnecessary accumulation of space junk. Other suggested measures include the removal of large pieces of debris with instruments such as harpoons and lasers, the development of self-removing satellites, and the coating of satellites in polymeric foam to allow them to descend and burn up in the Earth's atmosphere. However, as of yet, there is no universally recognised solution to the problem, and more spaceflight companies must adhere to the existing guidelines to reduce the future accumulation of space junk.

Collisions between satellites create more debris

The Kessler syndrome, proposed by NASA scientists Donald J. Kessler and Burton G. Cour-Palais in 1978, describes a situation where the density of objects in low Earth orbit (LEO) becomes so high that collisions between these objects exponentially increase the amount of space debris over time. This proliferation of debris poses significant risks to satellites, space missions, and the International Space Station, threatening the sustainability of space activities.

Collisions between satellites can create a massive amount of space debris. For example, in 2009, the inactive Russian satellite Cosmos 2251 collided with the active American communication satellite Iridium 33 above Siberia, resulting in approximately 2,000 pieces of debris at least 10 cm in diameter and thousands of smaller pieces entering Earth's atmosphere. It is estimated that over 50% of the debris from Iridium 33 will remain in orbit for at least a century, while that of Cosmos 2251 will persist for at least 20 to 30 years.

Another notable collision occurred in 2009 between the Iridium 33 communications satellite and the derelict Russian Kosmos 2251 spacecraft, resulting in the destruction of both satellites and the creation of more debris. In 2013, there were two more collisions: one between debris from the Fengyun FY-1C satellite and the Russian BLITS nano-satellite, and another between two CubeSats, Ecuador's NEE-01 Pegaso and Argentina's CubeBug-1, and the particles of a debris cloud around a Tsyklon-3 upper stage.

These collisions highlight the critical need for effective space traffic management and collision avoidance strategies to mitigate the risks posed by space debris. The increasing number of satellites in orbit raises the likelihood of collisions, which can have severe consequences for space exploration and the environment.

Incinerated satellites damage the ozone layer

The incineration of satellites during re-entry is a growing concern for scientists, particularly regarding the potential damage to the ozone layer. Satellites are mostly made of aluminium, which, when burned at high temperatures, turns into aluminium oxide, or alumina. Alumina is a white powdery substance that can remain suspended at high altitudes for decades or even centuries. This accumulation of aluminium ash is concerning because of its potential to damage the Earth's protective ozone layer.

The ozone layer absorbs harmful ultraviolet (UV) radiation, protecting living organisms on the planet's surface from damage. In the 1980s, a hole in this layer opened up above Antarctica due to the use of chlorine- and fluorine-rich gases in refrigerants and aerosol sprays. While the ozone layer has been recovering thanks to the Montreal Protocol, which banned these substances in 1987, the increase in satellite megaconstellations threatens to thwart this progress.

Megaconstellations are conglomerates of hundreds or even thousands of individual satellites working together. The rise in the number of defunct satellites burning up during reentry could lead to a significant increase in ozone-damaging pollutants in the atmosphere. A study by researchers from the University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles found that within the next 30 years, concentrations of aluminium oxides in the atmosphere could increase by up to 650%.

The burning of aluminium during satellite re-entry produces aluminium oxides, which can trigger ozone destruction processes without being consumed in the reactions. As a result, the concentrations of these substances remain stable, allowing them to continue to deplete the ozone layer until they naturally descend to lower altitudes. This descent can also take up to 30 years.

The potential impact of satellite megaconstellations on the ozone layer is not yet fully understood, and more research is needed. However, scientists warn that the atmospheric processes triggered by the chemicals released during satellite incineration could lead to an uncontrolled geoengineering experiment with unknown consequences. The increase in aluminium oxides in the atmosphere could also alter the Earth's albedo, or ability to reflect sunlight, potentially resulting in changes in the temperature of the upper atmosphere.

The incineration of satellites affects the planet's thermal balance

The incineration of satellites during their re-entry into the Earth's atmosphere has a significant impact on the planet's thermal balance. This process releases aluminium oxide, or alumina, a white powdery substance that can remain suspended at high altitudes for extended periods. Alumina has the potential to damage the ozone layer and alter the Earth's albedo, or reflectiveness.

Ozone plays a crucial role in protecting life on Earth by absorbing a significant portion of the sun's ultraviolet (UV) radiation. The atmospheric incineration of satellites, particularly those made of aluminium, produces aluminium oxide particles. These particles can remain suspended in the mesosphere and stratosphere, the middle layers of the atmosphere, for a long time due to the high altitudes at which they are released. This accumulation of aluminium oxide can lead to a significant increase in ozone depletion, as studies have suggested.

The ozone layer protects the Earth's surface from harmful UV radiation, which can have detrimental effects on human health and the environment. By depleting the ozone layer, more UV radiation can reach the Earth's surface, leading to potential health issues such as skin cancer and damage to ecosystems. Additionally, the alteration of the Earth's albedo can result in changes in the temperature of the upper atmosphere, potentially affecting climate patterns and weather systems.

The impact of satellite incineration on the planet's thermal balance is a growing concern due to the increasing number of satellites in orbit. With the expected growth in satellite constellations and the subsequent increase in re-entries, the concentrations of these damaging gases and particles are expected to rise rapidly. This could thwart the recovery of the planet's ozone layer and lead to possible serious consequences on the planet's climate.

It is important to note that the full extent of the impact of satellite incineration on the planet's thermal balance is still being studied, and the long-term effects may not be fully understood for decades or even centuries. However, the potential for harm is significant, and it is crucial to address this issue before it becomes an even more severe environmental emergency.

Frequently asked questions