Recycling Plastic: Pollution Solution Or Environmental Challenge?

Plastic recycling is often touted as a solution to the world's plastic waste problem. However, it has been found that the very process of recycling can release large quantities of harmful microplastics into the environment. A study of a UK-based recycling facility found that between 6 to 13% of the plastic processed could end up in water or the air as microplastics. These tiny particles have been found everywhere, from the Antarctic snow to human bodies.

Furthermore, recycled plastic has been found to contain toxic chemicals, including pesticides and pharmaceuticals, which pose risks to both human health and the environment. The complex composition of plastic, with its various chemical additives, also makes it difficult to recycle different grades of plastic together without degrading properties. As a result, scientists have stated that there are no plastics that can be deemed safe or circular.

While recycling is an important step towards tackling global warming and reducing waste, the challenges faced by plastic recycling highlight the need for a more systemic change. This includes reducing plastic consumption, transitioning to sustainable plastic alternatives, and improving waste management systems.

Plastic recycling can release harmful microplastics into the environment

Plastic recycling can indeed reduce pollution. However, it is important to note that the process of recycling plastic can also release harmful microplastics into the environment. Research has shown that recycling facilities may be a source of microplastic pollution, as the process of breaking down plastics can generate microplastic particles that end up in water or air. This contributes to an already concerning environmental problem, with microplastics found everywhere from Antarctic snow to inside human bodies.

A study of a recycling facility in the United Kingdom found that between 6 and 13 percent of the plastic processed could be released as microplastics. These particles are smaller than five millimeters and pose a significant risk to both the planet and human health. The study also revealed that even with filters in place, the mechanical recycling process can still result in a large number of microplastic particles in the wastewater.

The problem of microplastics is not limited to the recycling process itself. It is estimated that more microplastics enter the soil from wastewater sludge used for agricultural purposes than from plastic entering oceans or freshwater sediments. This contamination of soil can have detrimental effects on soil health and productivity, as well as harm soil-dwelling organisms.

The complex chemical composition of plastics, which includes additives for flexibility, strength, and colour, is a key factor in the difficulty of recycling. Many of these chemicals are toxic, and the act of recycling can result in higher concentrations of these harmful substances. This issue is further exacerbated by the low recycling rate of plastics, with only 9% of plastic waste being successfully recycled globally.

The release of harmful microplastics during the recycling process underscores the need for a more comprehensive approach to addressing plastic pollution. While recycling can play a role in reducing plastic waste, it is evident that a significant reduction in plastic production and consumption is necessary to mitigate the environmental and health risks associated with microplastics.

Recycled plastic can contain toxic chemicals, including pesticides and pharmaceuticals

Recycling plastic can create toxic microplastics that pollute the environment and harm human health. Research has found that the process of breaking down plastics for recycling can generate polluting microplastics that end up in water or the air. These microplastics, which are tiny particles smaller than five millimeters, have been detected everywhere, from Antarctic snow to human bodies. This issue is further exacerbated by the low recycling rate of plastics, with only about 9% of plastic waste being successfully recycled globally.

The presence of toxic chemicals in recycled plastics is a significant concern. Scientists have examined recycled plastic pellets from various countries and found hundreds of toxic chemicals, including pesticides and pharmaceuticals. These chemicals can cause harm to humans and other organisms, and their presence renders the recycled plastics unfit for most purposes. The complexity of plastic materials and waste streams also contributes to the problem, as recycled plastics may be contaminated by other substances during the recycling process.

The issue of toxic chemicals in recycled plastics is not limited to a specific region but is a global concern. Studies have been conducted in Africa, South America, Asia, and Eastern Europe, all identifying similar issues. The international trade in plastic waste complicates the regulation of these toxic chemicals, and the lack of transparency in the chemical composition of plastics makes it challenging to address the problem effectively.

To address this issue, several changes have been proposed. These include increased transparency regarding the use of chemicals and their risks, simplifying the chemical composition of plastics to reduce the number of toxic substances used, improving waste management infrastructure, and enhancing recycling methods to better monitor and control hazardous chemicals. However, it is important to note that the presence of toxic chemicals in recycled plastics is not limited to the recycling process itself, as plastics can absorb chemicals during their use. For example, a plastic jug used for storing pesticides will absorb some of the pesticides and contaminate the recycling waste stream.

In conclusion, recycled plastic can indeed contain toxic chemicals, including pesticides and pharmaceuticals, which pose risks to human health and the environment. Addressing this issue requires a multifaceted approach, including improved regulations, increased transparency, and a reduction in the use of toxic chemicals in plastic production.

Plastic recycling is incompatible with a circular economy

The very nature of plastics and their related challenges appear incompatible with circularity. Plastics are almost universally made from non-renewable feedstocks of fossil fuels. All plastics, even those made from bio-based or recycled feedstocks, incorporate additives made of similarly non-renewable fossil feedstocks. They all shed or deteriorate over time into micro- and nanoplastics, leaching toxic chemicals into surrounding products and the environment, and often absorbing other pollutants, which can then wreak havoc on human and animal health.

Recycling plastic can make it more toxic and should not be considered a solution to the pollution crisis. The global environmental network Greenpeace has warned that "plastics are inherently incompatible with a circular economy". Breaking down plastics for recycling scatters microplastic pollution into the environment.

The chopping, shredding, and washing of plastic in recycling facilities may turn as much as 6 to 13% of incoming waste into microplastics—tiny, toxic particles that are an emerging and ubiquitous environmental health concern for the planet and people. If the calculations are representative of the recycling industry as a whole, the scale of microplastics created during recycling processes would be shocking—perhaps as much as 400,000 tons per year in the United States alone, or the equivalent of about 29,000 dump trucks of microplastics.

Recycling could be exacerbating the problem by creating an even more vexing conundrum. Instead of helping to tackle the world's staggering plastic waste problem, recycling may be exacerbating a concerning environmental problem: microplastic pollution. A recent peer-reviewed study that focused on a recycling facility in the United Kingdom suggests that anywhere between 6 to 13% of the plastic processed could end up being released into water or the air as microplastics.

The circular economy is an economic system in which materials are designed to be used, not used up. From the outset, products and the systems they sit within should be designed to ensure no materials are lost, no toxins are leaked, and the maximum use is achieved from every process, material, and component. If applied correctly, the circular economy benefits society, the environment, and the economy.

To achieve a circular economy, we need to reduce the amount of material that needs to be circulated. We need to rethink the way we make, use, and reuse plastics, essentially redesigning the system in which the material is used.

Plastic recycling can be more toxic than virgin plastic

Recycling plastic can be more toxic than virgin plastic and should not be considered a solution to the pollution crisis. This is because the very process of recycling can release large quantities of harmful microplastics into the environment. A peer-reviewed study of a UK-based mixed plastics recycling facility found that between 6 and 13% of the plastic processed could be released into water or the air as microplastics. These tiny particles have been found everywhere, from Antarctic snow to inside human bodies.

Another issue with plastic recycling is that it can be inefficient and unsustainable. Mechanical recycling, the only commercial recycling process for plastic adopted on a large scale, results in quality degradation, with plastic typically only being recycled once or twice before it is no longer reusable. Additionally, the market demand for recycled plastic is low, as some industries prefer to use cheap, fossil-based virgin plastics, which can cost less than recycled materials.

Furthermore, recycled plastic has been found to contain toxic chemicals, including pesticides and pharmaceuticals, which present risks to recycling workers, consumers, and the environment. Greenpeace has identified three 'uncontrollable poisonous pathways' for toxic chemicals in recycled plastic: toxic chemicals in new virgin plastic materials, leaching of toxic substances into plastic waste, and the creation of new toxic chemicals during the recycling process. As a result, no plastic can be truly considered safe, even in closed-loop plastic recycling systems.

The problems with plastic recycling highlight the need for a systemic change to address the plastic pollution crisis. Consumers can play a role by minimizing the use of conventional plastic, opting for bio-based reusable containers, selecting goods packed in sustainable alternative materials, and buying products package-free whenever possible. Additionally, policymakers and companies must take bolder measures to reduce the use of fossil-based plastics and transition to safe and circular plastic alternatives.

Plastic recycling is inefficient and unsustainable

Secondly, the recycling process of conventional plastic is inefficient and unsustainable, whether done mechanically or chemically. Mechanical recycling, the only commercial recycling process for plastic adopted on a large scale, results in quality degradation, with plastic typically only able to be recycled once or twice before it is no longer reusable. Furthermore, the market demand for recycled plastic is low due to material degradation, with some industries opting for cheap, fossil-based virgin plastics instead.

Lastly, recycled plastic often contains hazardous chemicals, including pesticides, pharmaceuticals, flame retardants, benzene, and other carcinogens, which can be detrimental to human health and the environment. These toxic chemicals can be transferred from virgin plastic materials to recycled plastics, leached from toxic substances in the waste stream, or created by the heating of plastics during the recycling process.

In conclusion, plastic recycling is inefficient and unsustainable due to the release of microplastics, the limitations of current recycling technology, and the presence of hazardous chemicals in recycled plastic.

Frequently asked questions