Hydropower's Water Pollution: Is It Really Clean Energy?

Hydropower is often considered a clean energy source, but it can have a significant impact on the environment. While hydropower generators do not directly emit air pollutants, the construction and operation of dams, reservoirs, and hydroelectric generators can affect the surrounding ecosystems and communities. This paragraph will explore the question: Can hydropower pollute water?

Hydropower plants can obstruct fish migration

There are a variety of methods to mitigate this problem, including the construction of fish ladders and elevators, which help fish move around or over dams to their spawning grounds upstream. However, these solutions are not always effective, and fish can still be injured or killed by turbine blades.

The effectiveness of bypasses—alternative routes that allow fish to avoid passing through the turbines—depends on various factors, including discharge, dimensioning, location, and the specific fish community. Increasing the discharge of bypasses, for example, by enlarging the openings, could make them more effective. Additionally, combining physical barriers with behavioural barriers, such as electric fields, could enhance fish protection.

The construction of hydropower dams can also lead to the flooding of land, destroying forests, wildlife habitats, agricultural land, and scenic areas. This can have a significant impact on aquatic ecosystems and the environment as a whole.

Hydropower can change water temperatures

Hydropower can indeed change water temperatures. The presence of a hydropower station can have a significant impact on the temperature of the downstream river. The temperature change is more pronounced in the wet season than in the dry season. The degree of warming varies depending on the season and the study area. The warming effect is more widespread than the localized instances of cooling. The strength and extent of the reservoir's temperature regulation effect depend on the geographical location and the climate conditions at the reservoir.

The construction of a reservoir increases the surface area of the water body and causes seasonal changes in the surface temperatures of the surrounding areas. The reservoir's temperature regulation effect is more prominent in the downstream area. In dry-hot valleys, the warming and cooling effects exist simultaneously. The cooling effect is confined to the valley floor area, while the warming effect is observed in the high-altitude regions. In non-dry-hot valleys, the cooling effect is more widespread than warming. In the cold-dry valley, the cooling effect persisted year-round.

The impact of the reservoir's temperature regulation effect varies in different regions. In dry-hot valleys, there is widespread warming at higher altitudes and more localized cooling in the valley floor area. In non-dry-hot valleys, the cooling effect is more widespread than warming.

Hydropower can cause eutrophication and algal blooms

Hydropower is a significant source of energy, contributing substantially to electricity generation globally. However, it is essential to recognise that hydropower facilities can negatively impact water quality, leading to eutrophication and algal blooms.

Eutrophication is a process where nutrients accumulate in water bodies, stimulating excessive growth of microorganisms, which can deplete oxygen levels. This process can occur naturally or due to human activities. In the context of hydropower, reservoirs formed by damming rivers can experience eutrophication due to their efficient trapping of particulates and long water residence times. The stagnant water in reservoirs provides favourable conditions for eutrophication, as it allows nutrients like nitrogen and phosphorous to accumulate.

The eutrophication process in reservoirs can have several ecological consequences. Firstly, it leads to an increase in algae population, known as algal blooms. These blooms can degrade water quality by consuming oxygen and releasing toxins, which can be harmful to aquatic life and require additional treatment before the water enters turbines. Moreover, algal blooms can negatively impact the taste, colour, and odour of water, making it unsuitable for human consumption. Certain types of algae are poisonous and can pose risks to human health if ingested.

Furthermore, algal blooms can cause operational challenges in hydropower facilities. They can clog intake screens and filters, reducing water flow and decreasing operational efficiency. The accumulation of algae on turbine blades increases friction and drag, leading to reduced energy conversion efficiency and higher maintenance costs. The organic growth of algae on concrete linings in tunnels can also affect their efficiency and structural integrity.

The economic implications of algal blooms in hydropower facilities are significant. Increased maintenance and repair costs, along with potential fines for non-compliance with water quality regulations, can strain operational budgets and impact the financial viability of hydropower projects.

To mitigate the impacts of eutrophication and algal blooms, it is essential to minimise nutrient pollution from sources such as sewage and agricultural runoff. Additionally, the introduction of algae-inhibiting organisms, such as shellfish and seaweed, can help control the growth of harmful algae.

Hydropower can release mercury into the water

Hydropower is a renewable source of electricity that does not produce direct carbon emissions. However, it can still have a range of environmental impacts, including water quality degradation. One of the ways in which hydropower can pollute water is by releasing mercury into it.

When land is flooded to create a reservoir for a hydropower project, the water interacts with the rock and soil of the reservoir. This interaction releases elemental mercury found in the reservoir's rock and soil, which then mixes with bacteria released during the decomposition of submerged plant material. This process results in the formation of either mono-methylmercury or the more volatile di-methylmercury. Both of these forms of mercury are water-soluble and will begin to accumulate within the water system. The long residence time of the reservoir allows mercury concentrations to increase in the water system.

The accumulation of mercury in the water system can have significant ecological and human health impacts. Mercury will begin to biomagnify within the food chain, which can eventually pose health risks to people who consume fish from the water body. This issue has been observed in Canada, where protests have erupted over the high levels of methylmercury found in the reservoirs of large hydroelectric dams. The indigenous people living near these dams have raised concerns about the potential for mercury poisoning among those who consume fish or game caught downstream.

The impact of hydropower on mercury levels in water systems is a complex issue that requires further investigation. Studies have shown that factors such as water level fluctuation frequency and sediment exposure to air can influence mercury concentrations. Additionally, the specific characteristics of the reservoir, such as its size and location, can also play a role in determining mercury levels.

To mitigate the release of mercury into the water, it is important to carefully consider the location and design of hydropower projects. By understanding the potential impacts on mercury levels, steps can be taken to minimize the risk of mercury accumulation and protect both the environment and human health.

Hydropower can cause water loss through evaporation

Hydropower is a significant source of renewable energy, and its use has been crucial, especially for developing countries. However, it is essential to consider the potential environmental impacts of hydropower, including water loss through evaporation.

Hydropower plants often have large storage reservoirs, which, like all free water surfaces, are prone to evaporation. This natural process can be seen as a loss of hydropower potential. The water lost through evaporation could be considered a loss from the river basin, as it would otherwise contribute to the water flow in the river.

The formation of reservoirs, which are much more still than flowing rivers, results in the development of oxygen-rich and oxygen-poor layers within the water. These oxygen-poor or hypoxic areas are unhealthy for aquatic life. Additionally, reservoirs are more prone to eutrophication, the enrichment of water with chemical nutrients, due to their efficiency in trapping particulates and their long water residence time. Eutrophication, combined with a lack of water movement, can lead to algal blooms, further degrading water quality.

The impact of evaporation in reservoirs is influenced by various factors, including the type and size of the hydropower plant, reservoir area, and climate conditions. Run-of-river hydropower plants, which do not have reservoirs, generally do not contribute to water loss through evaporation. In contrast, diversion power plants with reservoirs tend to have higher hydraulic heads, resulting in higher energy production and lower water footprint values.

The water footprint of hydropower refers specifically to the blue water footprint, which is the consumption of blue water resources (surface and groundwater). The water footprint of a hydropower plant can be calculated as the ratio between the evaporation of the reservoirs and the hydroelectric energy generated.

Overall, while hydropower provides significant benefits as a renewable energy source, it is important to acknowledge and address the potential water loss through evaporation and its impact on the surrounding ecosystem.

Frequently asked questions