Surgical Masks: Effective Pollution Protection?

Surgical masks have become increasingly common outside of healthcare settings since the COVID-19 pandemic. But do they help with pollutants? Surgical masks can provide some protection against larger pollution particles, but they are less effective at filtering out smaller particles or harmful gases. For this reason, masks with higher filtration capabilities, such as N95 or P2 respirators, are recommended for situations involving higher risk or exposure to smaller particles. Surgical masks are also not designed to be reused and should be disposed of after each use. While they can provide some protection against pollutants, their primary function is to protect others from the wearer's respiratory droplets and to protect the wearer from accidental splashes of blood or other body fluids.

Cloth masks vs surgical masks

The debate between cloth masks and surgical masks has been ongoing since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. While surgical masks are FDA-tested, regulated, and approved for medical use, cloth masks are not FDA-approved and are not intended for medical use. Cloth masks are typically recommended for general public use, while surgical masks are intended for healthcare staff and first responders.

Cloth masks are typically made from common fabrics like 100% cotton and can be made at home or bought ready-made. They are not standardised, and their efficiency is questionable, especially in terms of filtration. Cloth masks are designed to reduce the amount of infectious material that the wearer puts out into the air, protecting others from an infected wearer. They are recommended for everyone and should be worn instead of masks intended for medical use.

Surgical masks, on the other hand, are designed to protect the wearer from hazardous bodily fluids and are supposed to reduce the risk of exposure to saliva, contaminants, and respiratory secretions of others. They are also meant to block large-particle droplets, splashes, sprays, or splatters that may contain germs, keeping them from reaching the wearer's mouth and nose. Surgical masks are not intended to be reused and should be disposed of after a single use.

In terms of effectiveness, N95 masks are considered the best option for personal protection, followed by surgical masks, and then cloth masks. N95 masks provide the most protection against both aerosol and respiratory droplet transmission, while surgical masks are less effective against aerosol transmission. Cloth masks often do not have enough layers or a tight enough weave to effectively filter out viral particles.

Pore size in surgical masks

Surgical masks are designed to help block large-particle droplets, splashes, sprays, or splatters that may contain germs, viruses, and bacteria. They also help reduce exposure to saliva and respiratory secretions. However, surgical masks are not designed to block very small particles in the air that may be transmitted by coughs or sneezes.

The pore size of surgical masks varies, but it typically ranges from 0.3 to 10 μm. The pore size of the middle filtering piece of a 3-ply surgical mask is smaller than that of the outer layers due to the use of a melt-blowing fabrication process. This process creates microfibres with a finer pore size than other methods, such as spunbond.

The filtering capacity and level of protection provided by a surgical mask depend on the materials used and the engineering design. Masks made with materials that have larger pore sizes, such as cotton and synthetic fabric, are less effective at filtering tiny virus-laden droplets compared to masks made with smaller pore sizes.

While surgical masks can provide some protection against pollutants, they are not specifically designed for this purpose. Their primary function is to block large particles and droplets containing germs, viruses, and bacteria.

It is important to note that the effectiveness of surgical masks in preventing respiratory infections has been a subject of debate, with some studies indicating their effectiveness in preventing disease transmission when adherence to mask usage guidelines is considered.

Filtering efficiency of surgical masks

Surgical masks are primarily used to prevent the migration of microorganisms from the nose and mouth of healthcare professionals to the patient. They are also effective in reducing airborne transmission of pathogens and other aerosolized pollutants. They protect against viruses transmitted by sneezing, coughing, or coming in close contact with others.

Surgical masks are not meant to protect against airborne diseases and viruses. They are not designed to form a seal around the nose and mouth and do not filter very small particles. They are not intended to be reused and should be disposed of after use.

Surgical masks are disposable devices that help block large-particle droplets, splashes, sprays, or splatters that may contain germs (viruses and bacteria). They may also help reduce exposure to saliva and respiratory secretions. However, they do not filter or block very small particles transmitted by coughs, sneezes, or certain medical procedures. They do not provide complete protection from germs and other contaminants due to the loose fit between the mask and the face.

Surgical masks vary in shape and thickness and are loose-fitting. They filter approximately 95% to 98% of particles depending on their ASTM categorization, with Levels 1, 2, and 3 ranking from least to most effective. The effectiveness of a mask is measured by its filtering efficiency, which depends on the type of mask material, particle size, and charge of the aerosol tested. A mask is considered effective if its filtering efficiency is greater than 95%.

Real-world studies on surgical masks

Surgical masks are commonly used by healthcare professionals. They are effective in reducing the airborne transmission of pathogens and other aerosolized pollutants. They also protect against the transmission of viruses due to coughing, sneezing, or spitting. However, surgical masks are not meant to be reused and should not be shared with others.

There have been several real-world studies on the effectiveness of surgical masks in preventing respiratory infections. One such study, "Unmasking the mask studies: why the effectiveness of surgical masks in preventing respiratory infections has been underestimated", found that when adherence to mask usage guidelines is considered, surgical masks are effective in preventing disease transmission. The study also concluded that masks can have a disproportionately large protective effect and that wearing a mask more frequently provides compounding protection.

Another study, "Microplastics in Wastewater: Microfiber Emissions from Common Household Laundry | Environmental Science and Pollution Research" by Galvao et al. in 2020, examined the release of microfibres from washing daily wear clothes in a standard washing machine. The study found that 40% of the synthetic fibers released were in the range of 100-500 μm, and 53% were in the range of 50-100 μm, with only 7% of synthetic fibers longer than 500 μm. This study highlights the potential environmental impact of the increased use of disposable surgical masks during the COVID-19 pandemic, as the random disposal of these masks may contribute to microplastic pollution.

In addition, a systematic review of original research published after January 1980 examined the effectiveness of surgical masks in preventing disease and symptoms among non-clinically trained individuals. The studies included in this review spanned a variety of settings and locations, including university residence halls, hospitals, and households, with different risks of infection in their control groups. Most of the studies measured whether surgical masks protect the wearer, while some examined whether masks prevent the wearer from infecting others.

Overall, while surgical masks have been shown to be effective in blocking large-particle droplets and providing fluid barrier protection, they may be less effective against aerosol transmission compared to N95 masks or powered air-purifying respirators.

Alternative solutions to surgical masks

Surgical masks are commonly used to reduce exposure to airborne pollutants. However, their effectiveness in blocking small particles is limited due to their loose-fitting nature and porous material.

N95 Respirators

N95 respirators are known for their high filtration efficiency and ability to block out small particles. They are designed to form a tight seal around the face, minimising leakage and providing better protection against airborne pollutants. N95 masks are commonly used in healthcare settings and are regulated by the CDC's National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH).

Air Purifiers and Indoor Plants

Air purifiers can effectively filter out pollutants from indoor spaces. Additionally, certain plants have natural air-purifying properties, which can help improve indoor air quality.

Minimise Exposure to Polluted Areas

Reducing personal exposure to polluted areas is another effective strategy. This can be achieved by staying indoors during peak pollution times, using public transportation instead of personal vehicles, and avoiding high-pollution environments.

Biodegradable Masks

Scientists are also exploring the use of biodegradable materials in masks to reduce plastic pollution. For example, a study found that replacing the plastic nose holder in surgical masks with jute fibre created an environmentally friendly alternative that was comfortable and well-received by users. Other biodegradable materials being investigated include biodegradable polymers, natural fibres with antibacterial finishes, and cellulose-based materials.

While surgical masks offer some protection against pollutants, these alternative solutions provide enhanced protection or contribute to reducing overall pollution levels. It is important to note that a combination of interventions is optimal for preventing the transmission of microorganisms and mitigating the impact of air pollution on human health.

Frequently asked questions