Steam Trains: Polluting The Environment?

Steam trains are often considered “magical” and are popular with tourists. However, they are also a source of pollution. Steam trains typically burn fossil fuels like coal, gas, or wood, which releases carbon dioxide and other toxic compounds. While diesel trains are also polluting, the comparison between the two is complex. For example, while diesel trains emit more carbon dioxide per passenger kilometre, steam trains emit similar levels of carbon dioxide overall and continue to emit pollutants even when idle. Additionally, the extraction and processing of fuel sources for both types of trains cause environmental damage.

Steam trains burn fossil fuels like coal, gas, or wood, which releases carbon dioxide and other toxic compounds

Steam trains are usually powered by burning fossil fuels like coal, gas, or wood. This process releases carbon dioxide and other toxic compounds, which contributes to pollution and has negative effects on the environment.

The burning of coal, in particular, has been identified as a significant source of carbon dioxide emissions, with coal releasing more carbon dioxide per unit of energy than other fossil fuels. Additionally, coal combustion can release toxic compounds such as lead, mercury, sulfur dioxide, heavy metals, carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, unburned hydrocarbons, and more. These emissions have harmful impacts on both human health and the environment.

The impact of steam trains on the environment is further exacerbated by the mining and drilling processes associated with obtaining coal and gas. These extraction methods can cause additional pollution and environmental damage. Furthermore, the inefficiency of steam trains, with their poor fuel efficiency and low thermal efficiency, contributes to higher emissions and a greater environmental footprint.

While diesel trains have also been criticized for their emissions, the global shift from steam to diesel locomotives in the 1970s did not immediately improve air quality. This is because diesel trains emit pollutants such as particulate matter, carbon monoxide, hydrocarbons, and nitrogen oxides, and their emissions levels can vary depending on their speed and power output. However, diesel trains are more energy-dense than coal-powered trains and can travel further between fuel stops, which may reduce overall emissions in the long run.

As a result of the environmental concerns associated with steam trains and the search for more sustainable alternatives, experts are exploring new options. Hydrogen-powered trains, for example, are being considered as a potential solution as they produce no harmful emissions, only releasing water vapour. While there are challenges to implementing hydrogen fuel cell technology, advancements in this area could provide a greener future for rail transport.

The process of mining and drilling for coal and gas can also contribute to pollution

The process of mining and drilling for coal and gas can contribute significantly to pollution. Coal mining, for instance, involves surface mines (or strip mines), where the soil and rock above coal deposits are removed. A more extreme form of this is mountaintop removal mining, which involves removing the tops of mountains with explosives, significantly altering the landscape. Streams are sometimes covered with rock and dirt, and the water draining from these filled valleys may contain pollutants harmful to aquatic life. Coal mining and drilling operations can also release coalbed methane, which is a significant contributor to global warming.

Additionally, drilling for natural gas can impact the environment in several ways. Hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, involves pumping liquids under high pressure into wells to fracture rock and release natural gas. This process requires large amounts of water, which can affect aquatic habitats and water availability for other uses. Natural gas drilling can also produce contaminated water, which, if not properly handled, stored, and treated, can pollute land and water sources. The drilling process itself produces air pollution and can disturb people, wildlife, and water resources.

The burning of coal releases several principal emissions, including sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, particulates, carbon dioxide (CO2), mercury, and other heavy metals, all of which have detrimental effects on human health and the environment. While there have been efforts to reduce these emissions, such as the use of scrubbers to clean sulfur from smoke, the environmental impact of coal burning remains significant.

Similarly, the burning of fossil fuels, including natural gas, releases impurities that contribute to air pollution, known as the "invisible killer." This type of pollution can lead to respiratory, cardiovascular, and other diseases, posing a serious risk to human health. Fossil fuel development can also contaminate soil and drinking water sources with toxic substances, resulting in severe health issues for surrounding communities.

Steam trains release emissions even when idle as the fire is not extinguished while the journey is ongoing

Steam trains are indeed harmful to the environment. While steam is mostly water vapour, the process of creating steam involves burning fossil fuels like coal, gas, or wood, which releases emissions. Steam trains, therefore, contribute to air pollution and global warming.

Burning coal releases more carbon dioxide per unit of energy than other fossil fuels. It also emits toxic compounds such as lead, mercury, sulfur dioxide, heavy metals, carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, unburned hydrocarbons, and more. These compounds can interact with other atmospheric compounds to form even more greenhouse gases, such as tropospheric ozone. The mining and drilling required to obtain these fuels can also cause pollution.

Compared to diesel trains, steam trains release similar levels of carbon dioxide. However, diesel trains emit more carbon dioxide per passenger for every kilometre travelled. Diesel trains also emit pollutants such as particulate matter, carbon monoxide, hydrocarbons, and nitrogen oxides, especially when idle. Steam trains, on the other hand, continuously release emissions even when idle since the fire is not extinguished during the journey. This means that even when a steam train is stationary, it is still emitting pollutants into the surrounding environment.

The impact of steam trains on global temperatures is complex. While they produce significant CO2 emissions, they also release aerosols that have a cooling effect, known as global dimming, which partially offsets the warming effect of CO2. This phenomenon may explain why global temperatures began to rise in the 1970s, after many countries replaced steam locomotives with diesel ones and implemented cleaner air regulations.

To address the environmental impact of steam trains, experts are exploring alternative power sources, such as hydrogen fuel cells. Hydrogen-powered trains could reduce carbon emissions and eliminate harmful nitrogen and sulphur pollution, giving rail transport an environmental advantage over road transport once again.

Steam trains are less energy-efficient than diesel trains, which can go much further between fuel stops

Steam trains are often considered "magical" and are a draw for tourists. However, they are not as environmentally friendly as many assume. Steam trains burn fossil fuels like coal, gas, or wood, and the process of creating steam can release pollutants. While diesel trains are also powered by fossil fuels and emit pollutants, they are more energy-efficient than steam trains and can go much further between fuel stops.

Steam trains typically burn coal, which releases more carbon dioxide per unit of energy than other fossil fuels. Coal burning can also release toxic compounds such as lead, mercury, sulfur dioxide, heavy metals, carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, unburned hydrocarbons, and more. These compounds can interact with other atmospheric compounds to form greenhouse gases. Additionally, the mining and drilling of coal and gas contribute to pollution.

Diesel trains, on the other hand, emit pollutants such as particulate matter, carbon monoxide, hydrocarbons, and nitrogen oxides. Diesel trains release emissions even when idle, and their emissions increase at higher speeds. However, diesel is almost twice as energy-dense as coal, allowing diesel trains to travel longer distances before refueling.

The inefficiencies of steam trains are also evident in their poor thermal efficiency, often less than 50%. In comparison, diesel engines are more efficient, with diesel locomotives utilizing their maximum horsepower over a wider range of speeds. The higher energy density of diesel and the greater efficiency of diesel trains contribute to their ability to cover longer distances between fuel stops.

While both steam and diesel trains have environmental impacts, the comparison between the two is complex. Some argue that diesel trains likely contribute more to global warming due to the reduced production of aerosols, which have a cooling effect, compared to steam trains. However, the global shift from steam to diesel trains in the 1970s coincided with rising global temperatures, suggesting that the reduction in aerosols may have unmasked the warming effects of greenhouse gases.

In conclusion, while steam trains may have a certain nostalgic charm, they are less energy-efficient than diesel trains, which can cover greater distances between refueling. The higher energy density of diesel and the greater efficiency of diesel engines contribute to their longer range. However, the environmental impact of both types of trains is significant, and the transition from steam to diesel trains in the past may have had complex effects on global temperatures.

Hydrogen-powered trains could be a more environmentally friendly alternative to both steam and diesel trains

While steam trains may be considered "magical", they are not environmentally friendly. Steam trains burn fossil fuels like coal, gas, or wood, which releases carbon dioxide and other pollutants. The process of mining and drilling for these fuels can also cause pollution. Diesel trains, which also burn fossil fuels, emit pollutants such as particulate matter, carbon monoxide, hydrocarbons, and nitrogen oxides, even when idle.

As a result, countries are turning to hydrogen-powered trains as a more sustainable alternative. Hydrogen trains are considered emissions-free at the point of use and can be powered by hydrogen combustion engines or fuel cells that generate electricity. Hydrogen has a higher energy density than other fuels, and its use in trains requires less upfront infrastructure investment compared to electric railways. Hydrogen-powered trains have been piloted in several countries, including Germany, the United Kingdom, France, and the United States, with Germany launching the world's first hydrogen-powered train in 2018.

While hydrogen fuel technology still needs advancements in production, storage, refueling, and on-board energy management, it is believed that producing hydrogen using off-peak electricity from electrical grids will be economically viable. A European Commission report states that hydrail emissions are 45% lower than diesel trains if hydrogen is produced by steam methane reforming. Additionally, the expanding prevalence of wind power has led to surpluses of electrical energy in some countries, providing a low-cost and highly available energy source for hydrogen production via electrolysis.

With sustainability as a key focus in development, hydrogen-powered trains could play a significant role in decarbonizing rail transport and providing a more environmentally friendly alternative to both steam and diesel trains.

Frequently asked questions