Renewable Resources: Clean Energy, Minimal Pollution

Renewable energy sources, such as wind, solar, and geothermal power, produce little to no harmful emissions that cause air pollution or contribute to climate change. They are replenished by nature and emit little to no greenhouse gases or pollutants into the air. In contrast, traditional electricity generation from fossil fuels is the leading cause of industrial air pollution, releasing toxic air pollution and greenhouse gases that threaten air quality, wildlife, habitats, and climate health. As a result, there is a critical need to transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy sources, which can generate electricity with fewer negative environmental impacts and provide safe resources without damaging wildlife or their habitats.

Solar energy is clean, but manufacturing panels may cause emissions

Renewable energy sources produce little to no emissions that cause air pollution. However, not all renewable energy sources are equal in this regard. For instance, biomass emits air pollution from the burning of organic compounds, albeit less so than non-renewable energy sources. Similarly, while solar energy is considered a clean energy source, the manufacturing of solar panels may cause emissions.

Solar power plants and technologies generally do not emit pollution or greenhouse gases. However, solar energy requires materials, maintenance, and energy to operate. The production of these materials, such as metals and glass, can be energy-intensive and have associated environmental issues.

The manufacturing of photovoltaic (PV) cells and panels, for example, requires energy to run the machinery, and the hazardous chemicals used must be carefully handled to avoid accidental release into the environment. Some PV cell technologies also use heavy metals, which can be challenging to manage at the end of their life. Additionally, solar thermal systems often employ toxic fluids to transmit heat, which can harm the environment if not properly contained and disposed of.

The carbon footprint of solar panel manufacturing varies depending on the type of panel and the processes used. For instance, silicon manufacturing for monocrystalline solar cells results in carbon emissions, and the mining of metals such as copper, silver, indium, and tellurium produces emissions as well. However, polycrystalline cells are formed by melting silicon crystals together, a more energy-intensive process.

Despite the emissions associated with solar panel manufacturing, solar energy is still considered one of the cleanest sources of energy available. Solar panels typically become carbon neutral within the first three years of operation, and their lifetime emissions are significantly lower than those of natural gas and coal-powered electricity sources. Additionally, there is potential to further reduce the carbon footprint of solar panels by powering manufacturing with renewable energy, recycling materials, and increasing efficiency and longevity.

Wind energy is clean and does not affect water resources

Renewable energy sources produce little to no harmful emissions that cause air pollution. They are an essential part of addressing the urgent global challenge of climate change. While no form of energy is perfect, renewable energy sources are far better than polluting fossil fuels.

Wind energy is one of the cleanest sources of energy. Wind turbines do not directly contribute to air pollution emissions and do not require water for cooling. Wind energy is created using wind turbines that can be placed anywhere with high-speed winds, including hilltops and open water. In 2022, wind turbines in all 50 states generated more than 10% of the net total of the country's energy. Wind energy is easily integrated in rural or remote areas, such as farms, ranches, and coastal and island communities, where high-quality wind resources are often found.

Wind energy offers many advantages, which explains why it is one of the fastest-growing energy sources in the world. It is a domestic resource that enables economic growth and creates good-paying jobs. Wind projects deliver an estimated $2 billion in state and local tax payments and land-lease payments each year. Communities that develop wind energy can use the extra revenue to fund school budgets, reduce the tax burden on homeowners, and address local infrastructure projects.

However, wind turbines do have some environmental impacts. They produce noise and alter the aesthetics of the landscape. They may also impact local wildlife, and there are concerns about the risk to birds and bats. Additionally, the production of metals and other materials used in wind turbines can have environmental consequences, and fossil fuels may be used in this process. While most wind turbine materials can be reused or recycled, the blades cannot be recycled. However, advancements in technology, such as the use of thermoplastic resins, are being made to address this issue and reduce the energy required to manufacture blades.

Geothermal energy produces little NO2 or SO2 pollution

Renewable energy sources produce little to no greenhouse gas emissions that contribute to climate change. They emit fewer pollutants into the air compared to non-renewable energy sources, which release toxic air pollution and greenhouse gases that harm air quality and climate health.

While some renewable energy sources, such as biomass, produce air pollution and other emissions, wind, solar, and geothermal energy are considered safer and more common alternatives. Geothermal energy, in particular, has been praised for its low environmental impact.

Geothermal energy relies on the heat produced within the Earth. Water is injected deep underground and heated by the Earth's molten interior, returning as hot water or steam. This steam is then used to power a turbine to generate electricity.

Geothermal energy produces very little NO2 or SO2 pollution. It emits only one-sixth of the carbon dioxide that a natural gas power plant produces. The increase in geothermal electricity production has been linked to reduced NOx and SO2 emissions. For example, in 2017, the increase in geothermal electricity in Europe led to a cut in NOx emissions by 0.3 kt and SO2 emissions by 0.1 kt.

However, it is important to note that geothermal resources frequently contain sulfur compounds, and during electricity production, sulfur in the form of H2S can enter the atmosphere and react with other chemicals to produce SO2. Geothermal power plants emit 97% less acid rain-causing sulfur compounds than fossil fuel power plants of similar sizes.

Hydroelectric power plants can disrupt river ecosystems

Renewable energy sources, such as wind, solar, and geothermal power, produce little to no greenhouse gas emissions, making them cleaner alternatives to traditional fossil fuels. However, it is important to acknowledge that even renewable energy sources can have environmental impacts. For instance, hydroelectric power plants, which generate electricity from hydropower, can disrupt river ecosystems.

Hydroelectric power plants include both massive hydroelectric dams and small run-of-river plants. While these plants provide renewable energy, they can have varying degrees of impact on the ecosystems of rivers and their surrounding areas. The construction of a dam can produce harmful chemicals that seep into the river or water reservoir. Additionally, the flooding of land for a hydroelectric reservoir can result in the destruction of forests, wildlife habitats, agricultural land, and scenic areas. In some cases, entire communities have had to be relocated to make way for these reservoirs.

The water in dammed reservoirs tends to be more stagnant, leading to higher levels of sediments and nutrients. This environment fosters the growth of excessive algae and aquatic weeds, which can crowd out other river plant and animal life. Water loss through evaporation in these reservoirs is also significantly higher than in flowing rivers. If water levels downstream are not carefully managed, segments of the river can dry out, negatively impacting the plants and animals that depend on the river.

The release of water from reservoirs can also affect downstream ecosystems. The water released from reservoirs is typically colder and has lower dissolved oxygen levels than natural river water. To mitigate these issues, aerating turbines can be installed to increase oxygen levels, and multi-level water intakes can ensure that water is released from various levels of the reservoir. Additionally, the size of the reservoir and the nature of the flooded land can contribute to global warming emissions during the operation of the hydroelectric power plant.

While hydroelectric power plants can have ecological impacts, it is important to note that these projects do not all have the same effects. The specific consequences depend on various factors, including the size and flow rate of the river, existing habitats and climatic conditions, and the type, size, and design of the project. Some species may thrive in these altered environments, while others may decline or be minimally affected. Strategies for protection, mitigation, and enhancement are being implemented to address the environmental impacts of hydroelectric projects.

Biomass emits air pollution, but less than fossil fuels

Renewable energy sources produce little to no greenhouse gas emissions, even when considering their life cycle emissions. They are replenished by nature and emit little to no pollutants into the air. Sources like wind, solar, and hydroelectric power have little to no emissions that cause air pollution.

However, biomass, a renewable energy source, emits air pollution from the burning of organic compounds. Biomass burning creates additional pollutants, including particulate matter (PM), nitrogen oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), sulfur dioxide (SO2), lead, mercury, and other hazardous air pollutants (HAPs). The American Lung Association opposes biomass combustion as a form of energy generation because of the particle pollution and carcinogens released.

Despite this, biomass is still considered a better alternative to fossil fuels. When compared to the burning of fossil fuels, the environmental degradation caused by biomass is much less. Biomass and biofuels are alternative energy sources to fossil fuels. Fossil fuels are non-renewable and harm ecosystems and contribute to climate change. They release toxic air pollution and greenhouse gases, threatening air quality and climate health. Biomass, on the other hand, can be carbon-neutral because the source plants capture CO2 through photosynthesis, offsetting the emissions released during combustion.

While biomass emits air pollution, it is still a preferred option over fossil fuels as it causes less environmental harm. However, it is important to note that the transition to renewable energy sources like wind and solar is the ultimate goal, as they are the cleanest sources of energy with minimal to no emissions.

Frequently asked questions