Lakes Vs Oceans: Who's More Polluted?

Water pollution is a pressing issue that affects our lakes, rivers, and oceans. While all water sources face pollution threats, the concentration of pollutants in lakes relative to their surrounding landscapes and environments is often higher. This is because rivers and streams act as drainage basins, carrying contaminants from the land and depositing them in lakes and other water bodies. As a result, lakes are particularly vulnerable to pollution, with over half of US lakes and rivers considered too impaired for fishing, swimming, and drinking. However, it is important to note that oceans also face significant pollution, with 80% of marine pollution originating on land.

Plastic pollution in lakes is worse than in oceans

Plastic pollution is a pressing issue that affects both lakes and oceans. However, recent studies have revealed that plastic pollution in lakes can be even more severe than in the oceans, with significant implications for aquatic ecosystems and human health.

An international study, led by researchers from the University of Milan-Bicocca, analysed plastic pollution in 38 lakes and reservoirs across 23 countries. The results indicated that the concentration of plastics and microplastics in these freshwater environments could exceed that of the infamous oceanic garbage patches. More than 90% of the fragments retrieved from the lakes were fibres or fragments resulting from the degradation of larger plastic objects.

The density of plastic waste in lakes is influenced by various factors, including population density and surface area. Smaller lakes tend to have higher plastic concentrations as their smaller sizes make them more susceptible to pollution sources from the surrounding land and atmospheric deposition. Larger lakes, despite having longer shorelines and potentially more pollution sources, can dilute the impact due to their increased surface area.

The high levels of plastic pollution in lakes have far-reaching consequences. Plastics accumulating on the water's surface can promote the release of methane and other greenhouse gases, contributing to climate change. Additionally, the presence of plastics and microplastics in lakes can harm aquatic life and disrupt ecosystems. Contaminants can accumulate in fish and other organisms, impacting their health and, subsequently, the health of humans who consume them.

Addressing plastic pollution in lakes requires a multifaceted approach. It involves improving waste management practices, reducing plastic consumption, and implementing effective pollution reduction strategies. By tackling these issues, we can help mitigate the detrimental effects of plastic pollution on our freshwater resources and the ecosystems that depend on them.

Point source vs. non-point source pollution

The pollution of lakes and oceans is a pressing issue. Eighty percent of ocean pollution originates on land, and a significant pool of freshwater is in peril. More than one-third of lakes are polluted and unfit for swimming, fishing, and drinking.

Point source pollution is often easier to manage because the source, volume, and impact of the pollution can be easily identified. The sources of point source pollution are often confined and discrete, such as a pipe, ditch, channel, or tunnel. Examples include sewage and wastewater. Sewer overflows have been a chronic type of point source pollution, especially in the Great Lakes region.

Non-point source pollution, on the other hand, includes many activities that occur around lakes and is harder to manage. It includes runoff from agricultural fields, carrying fertilizers and pesticides, which feed harmful algal blooms. These blooms can make water toxic and lead to low-oxygen "dead zones." Non-point source pollution also includes urban runoff, with water running off streets carrying oil, chemicals, salt, debris, and trash into waterways and, ultimately, lakes. Atmospheric pollutants, such as car exhaust, can also enter lakes as acid rain, further reducing water quality.

The impact of non-point source pollution on specific waters can vary and may not always be fully assessed. However, it is known to have harmful effects on drinking water supplies, recreation, fisheries, and wildlife.

Plastic Pollution in Lakes vs. Oceans

An international study found that the density of plastic waste in lakes can be higher than in the largest oceanic garbage patches. Nearly a quarter of the plastic fragments found in lakes were analyzed to be polyester, polypropylene, and polyethylene. Population density and surface area were found to be the most relevant factors in plastic concentration.

Nitrogen and phosphorus pollution

Nitrogen and phosphorus are essential nutrients for plant and animal growth. However, when present in excessive amounts, they can have detrimental effects on aquatic ecosystems and human health. Nitrogen and phosphorus pollution in lakes is a pressing issue, with far-reaching consequences.

Nitrogen pollution in lakes is a significant concern, particularly in coastal wetlands. Experiments simulating nutrient pollution scenarios in wetlands within lakes Michigan and Huron revealed that nitrogen had a more pronounced effect on algal growth than phosphorus. Nitrogen loading can stimulate excessive algal blooms, leading to a buildup of organic matter as the algae grow, die, and accumulate on the lake bed. As this organic matter decomposes, it consumes oxygen, creating an anoxic environment that becomes less suitable for fish populations. This process can have cascading effects on the food web, as algae are a crucial energy source for many organisms in these ecosystems.

Phosphorus pollution also plays a role in lake contamination. While nitrogen may have a more immediate impact on algal growth, phosphorus loading has been known to cause harmful algal blooms as well. In Florida, toxic blue-green algal blooms were triggered by the release of phosphorus-laden waters from Lake Okeechobee. These algal blooms produce a foul odor, decrease dissolved oxygen, and threaten insect, fish, and even mammalian and human life with the toxins they produce.

The sources of nitrogen and phosphorus pollution are varied. As human populations expand and demands increase, more land is converted for agricultural and urban purposes, introducing higher levels of these nutrients into the environment. Nitrogen is commonly associated with transportation, industry, agriculture, and fertilizer use, while phosphorus often stems from sewage waste, soil erosion, and runoff from urban areas. Additionally, non-point source pollution, which is more challenging to manage, includes agricultural runoff containing fertilizers and pesticides, contributing to elevated nitrogen and phosphorus levels in lakes.

The pollution of lakes by nitrogen and phosphorus has severe ecological and potential human health consequences. It disrupts aquatic life, reduces biodiversity, and can lead to the production of toxins harmful to various organisms, including humans. Managing nitrogen and phosphorus pollution requires a comprehensive approach, addressing sources ranging from agricultural practices to sewage treatment, to protect and rehabilitate these fragile ecosystems.

Pesticides and fertilizers

Pesticides are substances designed to control, prevent, kill, reduce, or repel pests. They can be made from natural ingredients or synthetic chemicals, with each type targeting specific pests. All pesticides are toxic to some degree, and their toxicity varies depending on the organism exposed. For instance, a pesticide that is low in toxicity to humans and other mammals may be highly toxic to fish, bees, and birds. When pesticides enter waterways, they can be deadly to aquatic organisms, particularly tiny creatures known as aquatic invertebrates, which are referred to as nontarget organisms in the context of pesticide use. The death of these aquatic invertebrates affects the entire food chain, as many larger organisms depend on them for survival.

Fertilizers can also be a source of pollution, altering water quality and making it unsafe for recreation and drinking. Overfertilization can lead to leaf burn, reduced production, and plant death. When excess fertilizers enter water bodies, they contribute to nutrient pollution, specifically elevated levels of nitrates and phosphates. These nutrients can fuel harmful algal blooms and eutrophication, posing threats to aquatic life and human health. Fertilizer pollution can also result in "dead zones," where aquatic life cannot survive.

Both pesticides and fertilizers can enter lakes and oceans through agricultural and urban runoff, as well as sewage seepage from groundwater. This is particularly true for lakes, as they drain large surrounding landscapes and concentrate pollutants from upstream sources. In the case of the Great Lakes, irresponsible agricultural practices, including single-crop farming and factory farming, are major contributors to pollution. The excessive use of fertilizers and pesticides in these agricultural practices has led to harmful algal outbreaks, impacting drinking water quality and the region's economic well-being.

To mitigate the impact of pesticides and fertilizers on water bodies, it is essential to use them judiciously and follow safety guidelines. Applying them under the right weather conditions, such as calm weather with low wind speeds and no rain or snow, can help prevent their movement into waterways. Additionally, limiting the use of highly toxic pesticides, such as pyrethroids, organophosphates, and fipronil, can reduce their presence in lakes and oceans, protecting aquatic life and maintaining water quality.

Industrial waste

Industrial activities often require large quantities of water, and the resulting wastewater may contain harmful chemicals and contaminants. If not properly treated or disposed of, this wastewater can be discharged into nearby lakes and rivers, leading to increased pollution levels in these freshwater sources. For example, the Detroit River, which connects Lake Huron and Lake Erie, receives millions of gallons of wastewater and toxic pollutants like polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) annually.

The pollutants from industrial waste can have severe ecological consequences. Hazardous substances such as heavy metals (e.g., lead, mercury), solvents, and ammonia can find their way into the food chain, causing illness or death in fish, other animals, and even humans who consume them. These toxic chemicals can accumulate in aquatic organisms, leading to high contaminant levels in species like fish.

Lakes are particularly vulnerable to pollution due to their surrounding landscapes. Rivers and streams act as drainage systems for pollutants, which then concentrate in lakes. The natural processes in the surrounding areas, such as agricultural or urban activities, can introduce various contaminants into the water bodies. For example, pesticides, fertilizers, and manure from agricultural runoff can enter lakes, leading to elevated nutrient levels that promote harmful algal blooms.

Additionally, atmospheric deposition contributes to lake pollution. Air pollutants from industrial power generation or vehicle emissions can enter lakes as acid rain, further degrading water quality. The impact of these atmospheric pollutants on lakes can be more pronounced than on oceans due to their smaller volume and proximity to pollution sources.

While oceans are vast and may seem more resilient, they are not immune to the effects of industrial waste. Eutrophication, caused by excess nutrients and organic matter in the water, can lead to oxygen depletion and the creation of dead zones where marine life cannot survive. The release of carbon dioxide from industrial processes contributes to ocean acidification, which harms marine life, including shellfish that are part of the human food supply.

In summary, while both lakes and oceans are affected by industrial waste, the impact on lakes can be more immediate and severe due to their smaller size, surrounding landscapes, and vulnerability to atmospheric deposition. The pollution from industrial activities has far-reaching consequences for aquatic ecosystems and human health, underscoring the importance of proper waste management and the implementation of environmental policies to protect our water resources.

Frequently asked questions