Ferries Vs. Planes: Which Mode Pollutes More?

The environmental impact of air travel is a topic that has gained prominence in recent years, with some travellers boycotting flying due to its carbon footprint. This has led to a discussion on alternative modes of transport, such as ferries, and whether they are more environmentally friendly. Several factors determine the carbon footprint of a journey, including the type of vehicle, fuel type, fuel efficiency, length of the trip, and number of passengers. While ferries are generally considered to be a more eco-friendly alternative to air travel, it is important to consider the specifics of each journey, as some ferries may emit more carbon dioxide than planes under certain circumstances.

Ferries vs planes: carbon emissions

The carbon footprint of a journey depends on several factors, including the vehicle's age, fuel type and efficiency, length of the trip, and number of passengers.

Ferries and planes are no exception to this rule, and there is no clear consensus on which mode of transport is more polluting. Ferries are designed for efficiency, while planes are designed for speed. As such, ferries are generally more fuel-efficient and emit fewer carbon emissions per passenger kilometre. However, ferries also tend to carry fewer passengers, and the emissions from ships are more harmful as the CO2 that escapes their exhausts is promptly absorbed by seawater.

Cruise ships, on the other hand, are designed for luxury and comfort, and their carbon footprint is much higher than ferries. They produce large amounts of solid waste and generate additional emissions of CO2, NOx, sulfur dioxide, ammonia, and other toxic compounds through incineration.

The type of plane and the number of passengers also play a significant role in a plane's carbon emissions. The Environmental and Energy Study Institute estimates that planes emit about three pounds of CO2 per pound of fuel consumed, regardless of the phase of flight. Additionally, burning jet fuel generates nitrogen oxides, which contribute to the creation of ozone and have a more significant impact on the atmosphere than CO2 emissions.

In conclusion, while ferries generally have a lower carbon footprint per passenger kilometre than planes, the specific circumstances of each journey, such as the number of passengers and fuel efficiency, can significantly impact the overall carbon emissions. Additionally, the environmental impact of ferries and planes extends beyond just carbon emissions, with other harmful pollutants and waste contributing to the overall ecological footprint.

Cruise ships vs ferries: carbon emissions

The cruise industry has an enormous environmental footprint. Cruise ships and other maritime vessels, including ferries, account for about 3% of yearly greenhouse gas emissions.

A medium-sized cruise ship can emit as much particulate matter as one million cars. Cruise ships have gained a reputation for contributing to carbon emissions, with the largest and most efficient cruise ships emitting around 250 grams of CO2 per passenger per kilometre. This is considerably higher than the carbon intensity of air travel, which ranges from 10 to 130 grams of CO2 per passenger per kilometre.

Cruise ships also release nitrogen oxides (NOx) into the atmosphere, affecting the environment and human well-being. In Marseille, the NOx emissions from 57 cruise ships docked in 2017 were nearly equivalent to those produced by a quarter of the city's 340,000 passenger cars. Additionally, cruise ships produce seven tons of solid waste daily, with 15 billion pounds of trash being dumped into oceans per year. The incineration process generates additional emissions of CO2, NOx, sulfur dioxide, ammonia, and other toxic compounds.

Ferries, on the other hand, are considered a more environmentally friendly option than cruise ships or planes, especially for short-haul flights. The carbon footprint for a foot passenger on a ferry is only 19 grams per km, compared to 244 grams per km for a flight. Ferries that run on LNG (liquefied natural gas) are marketed as "green", but they are not completely environmentally friendly as they still produce nitrogen oxides and sulfur oxides.

While some cruise companies are investing in ships capable of running on methanol and LNG, the latter has been criticised as a "misleading solution" by environmental experts. LNG does reduce particulate emissions and certain pollutants, but it also emits unburned natural gas, which is a powerful greenhouse gas. Overall, LNG may have a worse impact on global climate change than traditional petroleum-based fuels.

The impact of plane emissions at high altitudes

The formation of contrails and the clouds they help form have a substantial warming impact on the climate, comparable to aviation's cumulative CO2 emissions. This is due to an effect known as 'radiative forcing', which disrupts the balance between incoming solar radiation and outgoing heat from the Earth's surface. While the impact of contrails is short-lived, the effects of CO2 emissions persist in the atmosphere for hundreds of years.

Research suggests that small altitude changes in aircraft flights can significantly reduce the climate impact of contrails. A study using data from Japan's airspace found that altering the altitudes of less than 2% of flights could reduce contrail-linked climate change by up to 59%. This approach could quickly decrease the overall climate impact of the aviation industry.

Additionally, the use of clean fuels and reductions in aromatics and naphthalene concentrations in jet fuel can lower non-CO2 effects and soot formation, contributing to a decrease in persistent contrails.

While ferries and boats may provide more eco-friendly alternatives to air travel on certain routes, the comparison between ferry and plane emissions depends on various factors. These factors include the vehicle's age, fuel type, efficiency, length of the trip, and number of passengers. In some cases, ferries and boats can emit more pollution than airplanes, especially when considering the high levels of sulfur oxides generated in port cities.

To summarize, the impact of plane emissions at high altitudes is significant due to the formation of contrails and the alteration of atmospheric properties. Small changes in flight altitudes and the use of clean fuels can help mitigate these effects, reducing the climate impact of the aviation industry. However, the comparison between ferry and plane emissions is complex and depends on multiple variables.

The environmental impact of plane vapour trails

Plane vapour trails, also known as contrails (short for "condensation trails"), are line-shaped clouds produced by aircraft engine exhaust or changes in air pressure, typically when the plane is at cruising altitude several kilometres or miles above the Earth's surface. Contrails are composed primarily of water in the form of ice crystals, which form when the water vapour in the aircraft engine exhaust combines with the low ambient temperatures at high altitudes.

The formation of contrails can also be influenced by impurities in the engine exhaust from the fuel, including soot and sulfur compounds. These impurities provide particles that serve as cloud condensation nuclei, promoting the growth of water droplets that can then freeze and form ice particles, creating the visible vapour trails. In addition to their water content, the vapor trails produced by rockets (known as "missile contrails" or "rocket contrails") contain metal oxide particles, high-temperature water vapour condensation particles, and other byproducts of engine combustion.

Contrails can have a significant impact on the environment. They can increase the cloudiness of the atmosphere, leading to the formation of homomutatus cloud forms that resemble cirrus, cirrocumulus, or cirrostratus clouds and are sometimes called cirrus aviaticus. High humidity can cause contrails to persist and spread over large areas, potentially increasing cloud cover. While the chemicals in the contrails may not reach ground level due to their high altitude, they can still have an impact on the atmosphere and climate.

Additionally, the use of biofuels in aircraft has been found to reduce contrail generation. A 2013-2014 study supported by NASA, the German aerospace center DLR, and Canada's National Research Council NRC found that biofuels produce fewer soot particles, which are the nuclei around which ice crystals form in contrails. By reducing the number of soot particles, biofuels can help decrease the formation of contrails and potentially mitigate their environmental impact.

The environmental impact of incineration on cruise ships

Cruise ships generate various types of waste, including sewage, wastewater (greywater), solid waste, oily bilge water, ballast water, and air pollution. The incineration of waste on cruise ships further exacerbates their environmental impact. Incinerators burn large volumes of garbage, plastics, and other waste, producing ash that must be disposed of. This process releases additional emissions of CO2, NOx, sulfur dioxide, ammonia, and other toxic compounds. The disposal of incinerator ash can lead to marine debris, posing threats to marine life, humans, and coastal communities.

The impact of cruise ship incineration is particularly significant in port cities, where air pollution levels have been negatively affected. The high levels of sulfur oxides generated by ships in port cities, such as Barcelona, are of concern, with ships producing five times more SOx than cars. The cruise industry's contribution to air pollution and acid rain is also notable, with sulphur dioxide emissions from a single cruise ship equaling that of 13.1 million cars per day.

The environmental impact of cruise ship incineration has led to increased scrutiny and the development of more sustainable practices. Some cruise lines are adopting advanced wastewater treatment systems, cleaner fuels, and other sustainability measures. For example, Scanship converts waste into biofuel, turning carbon-based waste into flammable gas, bio-oil, and charcoal, which can then be used to power cruise ships. Additionally, Norway is leading the way in building zero-emission cruise ships, with companies ordering cruise ships loaded with cutting-edge technology.

While ferries are generally considered more environmentally friendly than planes, the environmental impact of cruise ships is significant, especially when considering the incineration process. The high levels of waste generated on cruise ships and the subsequent incineration contribute to air and ocean pollution, impacting ecosystems and posing risks to public health. As the cruise industry continues to grow, addressing the environmental concerns associated with incineration and overall emissions will become increasingly crucial.

Frequently asked questions